April 11, 2007


Yesterday a friend told me about a Holy Week "Eucharist" he attended. The various parts of the Mass were done out of order, according to the tastes of the participants, and the presider's prayers were shared by everyone.

The institution narrative, i.e. "Take this, all of you, and eat it...Take this, all of you, and drink from it," was done by the priest, of course.

My greatest problem with this sort of thing is that it reinforces a magical approach to the sacraments. It's as if you don't need a priest for some parts of the Mass, but you do for this particular part, because it's the part that requires magical powers. Thus the sacrament of Order is not about leadership or speaking on behalf of the body of Christ, in persona Christi capitis, as it were, but about a cultic, magical power.

Thus in all their efforts to appear "liberal" and "progressive," folks who do this sort of thing only succeed in putting their shallow sense of sacraments and church on display.


Sr. Demanda Refund, IJ said...

Well, I have never heard of such a thing! What is the Church coming to!

Anonymous said...

I've heard that this is also done without priests, by both men and women (the consacration I mean). It was upsetting to hear that.

Anonymous said...

The most clericalist of actions is to for the presider to assume that the Mass is his to rearrange. The Mass does not belong to any priest, and therefore no priest is competent to alter it. Doing so is like going into a public space and rearranging the furniture: childish, idiosyncratic and annoying.